I try not to pay much attention to the worship wars these days, but as an active church musician and musicologist I pretty much can’t help it sometimes. My personal take: there’s room for both traditional and contemporary styles, even in the same service. However, my attitude is that traditional songs should remain traditional and contemporary ones should remain contemporary.* If there’s anything in modern worship music that I find distasteful it’s the rocking-up of classic hymns; this isn’t to say that you can’t mix some hymns in there, I just don’t want to hear generic rock beats and guitar strums. Give it to me with the piano and organ, old-school style. Similarly, I strongly believe that traditional, piano/organ-accompanied choirs shouldn’t do arrangements of contemporary P&W band music.** They have hundreds of years of sacred music tradition and a pool of literally thousands (tens of thousands? Hundreds of thousands?) of compositions from which to draw. (I don’t care if the words are in another language, put the translation in the bulletin insert!)
This leads me to the issue of modern composition for the church, one that I’m sure many others have written about with far more eloquence than I can muster here. Sacred music isn’t exactly my specialty, but I can tell you that up through the 18th century, the church was a powerful (if gradually diminishing) catalyst for new art music; church music leaders were expected to regularly prepare new material. In addition to choir pieces, chorales and organ pieces, many composers (not just heavy hitters such as Bach and Handel) cranked out larger-scale works such as masses, oratorios, cantatas, concertos and other instrumental pieces for special occasions.
I won’t go into a long ramble about all the factors that led to the demise of art music in church. It’s over and done. But why can’t it come back? Is it because of the absence of classical musicians in our congregations willing and able to rehearse and perform the material? The lack of composers interested in composing for churches? The lack of interest on the part of churches to encourage, nurture and promote whatever compositional talent may exist in their membership? Secular academia’s near monopoly on classical composition programs?*** Who knows. It may be one or it may be all of these.
* For some reason, this reminds me a little bit of Paul’s marriage advice in I Corinthians 7: if you’re married, stay that way. If you’re single, stay that way.
**On a semi-related note, I think this is why I didn’t care for the trend in the early 2000s of symphonies interpreting the music of famous rock bands (Pink Floyd, Yes, Metallica, etc.); the idea of juxtaposing rock aesthetics and purely orchestral timbres just leaves me cold. Maybe all those albums are really awesome and I’m totally missing out, but I’ll take the risk…
*** I include this question because, as a percussionist and enthusiast of weird music, I would love to see more adventurous, risky Christian music that incorporates elements of the avant-garde, experimental music, free improvisation, etc. — all of which are heavily (if not completely) secularized and dominated by academia. Classical music may fly in church still, but I can’t say the same for contemporary art music.